|
|
Evidence proceeding focused on expert opinion
Kudrna, Vojtěch ; Macková, Alena (advisor) ; Pohl, Tomáš (referee)
THESIS TITLE, ABSTRACT AND KEYWORDS Evidence proceeding focused on expert opinion This diploma thesis is dedicated to the problematics of performance of expert activity in relation to judicial evidence proceeding. The main goal of this thesis is to provide a comprehensive explanation about expert opinion whereas it is based on effective legal regulation of expert activity, on higher courts judicial practice and finally on professional literature. Understanding of this issue may play a significant role in both expert opinion elaboration and its subsequent production and evaluating before courts. The diploma thesis is notionally divided into two parts. The first part is the theoretical part, and it includes the first to third chapters of the thesis. In the first chapter the thesis delas with a general description of evidence proceeding in civil procedure. There are explained the basics concepts of this process without which would not be possible to continue in next explanation. There are also described other typical means of proof together with their specific characteristics in order that the reader of the thesis can distinguish the differences between them and expert opinion. In the second chapter of this thesis is discussed expert activity as such. Particularly important subchapter of this chapter is...
|
|
|
Position of a judge during evidence proceeding in contentious procedure with regard to the practice
Tajovská, Ludmila ; Macková, Alena (advisor) ; Pohl, Tomáš (referee)
The main goal of this master's degree thesis is to provide information about position of a judge during evidence proceeding in contentious procedure with special focus on production of evidence. In the text I often use particular decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic and the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic to demonstrate how theoretical legal institutes are applied in practice. I have decided to choose this topic because I am very interested in judge's profession and its practical aspects especially within evidence proceeding. More reasons for my research are stated in the very first introductory part of my theses. The whole theses is composed of three parts and each of them dealing with different sides of evidence proceeding or position of a judge within the meaning of his rights, duties, activity and also responsibility. Part One generally characterizes evidence proceeding and it makes the foundation for following part that is focused on partial phase of evidence proceeding (i.e. production of evidence). This part is divided into four chapters. The first chapter describes contentious and non-contentious procedure and also gives an explanation of main distinctions between these concepts. The second chapter concerns with basic principles of justice and civil procedure. The...
|
|
|
Position of a judge during evidence proceeding in contentious procedure with regard to the practice
Tajovská, Ludmila ; Macková, Alena (advisor) ; Pohl, Tomáš (referee)
The main goal of this master's degree thesis is to provide information about position of a judge during evidence proceeding in contentious procedure with special focus on production of evidence. In the text I often use particular decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic and the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic to demonstrate how theoretical legal institutes are applied in practice. I have decided to choose this topic because I am very interested in judge's profession and its practical aspects especially within evidence proceeding. More reasons for my research are stated in the very first introductory part of my theses. The whole theses is composed of three parts and each of them dealing with different sides of evidence proceeding or position of a judge within the meaning of his rights, duties, activity and also responsibility. Part One generally characterizes evidence proceeding and it makes the foundation for following part that is focused on partial phase of evidence proceeding (i.e. production of evidence). This part is divided into four chapters. The first chapter describes contentious and non-contentious procedure and also gives an explanation of main distinctions between these concepts. The second chapter concerns with basic principles of justice and civil procedure. The...
|
guest ::
